What is the difference between obedience and sacrifice

Sacrifice noun the act of losing or surrendering something as a penalty for a mistake or fault or failure to perform etc. Sacrifice noun personnel that are sacrificed e. Sacrifice noun the act of killing an animal or person in order to propitiate a deity.

Sacrifice noun sacrifice an out that advances the base runners. Sacrifice verb sell at a loss. Sacrifice verb make a sacrifice of; in religious rituals. Sacrifice Sacrifice is the offering of material possessions or the lives of animals or humans to a deity as an act of propitiation or worship. Sacrifice Illustrations. Popular Comparisons. Adress vs. Comming vs. Label vs. Genius vs. Speech vs.

Chief vs. Teat vs. Neice vs. Buisness vs. Beeing vs. Amature vs. Lieing vs. Preferred vs. Omage vs. Finally vs. Attendance vs. Latest Comparisons Tubercule vs. Sacrifices can never fulfill God's ultimate purpose of capturing people's hearts because sacrifices can be used to point back to the person offering them. We always find a way to make this exchange about ourselves, trying to offer enough and do enough for God.

We can never offer enough good to God. All the sacrifices in the world can't atone for our sin because of our sin nature. We'll never be without sin until we get to heaven. Therefore, God gave us a new law, the law of Christ. The only requirement of the new law is to love.

Obedience comes out of love. I'm sure Saul didn't understand God's lack of appreciation for the best sacrifices he could give Him. He might have thought, "Why wouldn't God be pleased with what I've done for Him?

We show our love by obeying Him because obeying Him reveals our true trust in Him. It's all about the heart. Nothing more. Now her passion is to mentor young women to live purposefully and grow in their relationship with God and others. Brenda has been married for five years to a heart transplant hero and is the mom of a toddler girl miracle.

Join Plus Plus Login. Why Is Obedience Better than Sacrifice? Kelly Campbell. All rights reserved. This is rarely, if ever, true of obedience. Sacrifice can be a matter of our initiative. And when they emerge, they must roll on the beach until they are covered with sand. Then they resume the previous activity or move on to the next activity, whether it is studying, working, sleeping or eating. The practice of getting wet and sandy not only requires toughness, it requires submission. SEAL candidates do not choose the moment that they rush into the cold water and then roll in the sand.

They must submit whenever they are given the command. Choosing your moment may involve sacrifice, but submitting your will to the one in authority. A Seal must put the mission above himself. That is also what a Christian should do. How great is the folly of men who hope to atone for their disobedience by any compensation, but particularly by religious rites!

It is not uncommon to hear this passage produced in order to prove the value of moral above positive precepts. Moral precepts, I suppose you know, are precepts of perpetual and unchangeable obligation, and positive, such as either have not, or do not seem to have, any intrinsic excellence in themselves, but depend upon the immediate and express institution of God. Now, though no doubt, if it is done with proper care, and upon legitimate principles, a distinction may be stated between these different kinds of duties; yet it is plain, that this cannot be the spirit of the passage before us.

Obedience is preferred to sacrifices, as they were uncommanded, free, and voluntary. If we attend to the sacrifices under the law, we shall find them of different kinds; particularly, we shall find them distinguished in this respect, that some of them were expressly and positively ordained, and others were left to the goodwill or spontaneous inclination of the offerer. The observation of the Sabbath, of circumcision, of the passover, the daily burnt offering, the annual sacrifice on the great day of expiation, the trespass offering, and many others, were so indispensably necessary, that no opposition was to be presumed or imagined between them and the moral law.

Nay, the whole circumstances of these rites were precisely specified, and those who varied anything in the manner of their observation were to he cut off from their people. Exodus ; Exodus I must further observe, that even with respect to voluntary or free-will offerings, though they were left at liberty whether they would offer such at all or not; yet if they did offer, the manner in which it behoved to be conducted, was appointed precisely. Now, nothing can be more plain, than that the sacrifices which Saul and his people had in view to offer, or at least pretended to have had in view, were voluntary or free-will offerings.

When you remember this you will see with how great lustier and force the prophet opposes sacrifices of this kind to obeying the voice of the Lord: "Hath the Lord as great delight in burnt offerings, as in obeying the voice of the Lord?

Obedience is opposed to sacrifices, as they are false and hypocritical. Even in those sacrifices that were most expressly appointed, and of the most indispensable obligation, there might be an essential defect, from the inward disposition not corresponding to the outward action.